https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254367
--- Comment #2 from John Baldwin <[email protected]> --- Hmm, this sounds like a good idea. In regards to 'etcupdate status -p', what would that do? 'etcupdate status' already reports any status after 'etcupdate -p' as there is a single, shared conflicts/ tree, and a shared warnings file, so a bare 'etcupdate status' after 'etcupdate -p' should report the right status to permit, for example: etcupdate -p while ! etcupdate status; do etcupdate resolve -p done etcupdate while ! etcupdate status; do etcupdate resolve done One question is what should etcupdate status report if there are no conflicts but there are warnings (warnings can be for things like needed post-install actions that can't be performed in a chroot)? These potentially still require user intervention. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
