https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266544
Magnus Kaiser <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Magnus Kaiser <[email protected]> --- Hi, I don't think that's supposed to work in the first place. Without having an address of the same prefix you try to reach you would need a first hop through some router. Multiple prefixes, even when on the same L2 link, are considered separate logical networks and you need some point to connect those logically too. Either by having an IP of that network configured yourself, or by using a router that connects to those networks. Is there a specific reason why multiple prefixes exists on one L2 link without using RAs? Any specific reason why using an IP of the other prefix is no alternative to static routes? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
