https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271817
--- Comment #6 from Mohamed Akram <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andrew "RhodiumToad" Gierth from comment #5) Thank you for this. > Alternatively, you (or GNU sed) may be assuming that "c" starts a new cycle > (rather > than executing the rest of the script) for every row of a 2-address range, > not just > the last one. This isn't what the spec actually says (as you quoted > yourself), > though it might be considered to be more useful or consistent. (I looked for > applicable defect reports against the spec, didn't find any.) I now wonder if other implementations output bdf as expected. Might be worth opening a ticket against the spec to clarify this ambiguity. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
