https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275370
--- Comment #2 from [email protected] --- > execvpe() is not a kernel syscall, it is libc wrapper for execve() syscall. That sounds about right. libc performs PATH-resolution and then calls execve(). Still, would it be possible to add execvpe()? The problem I face still stands. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
