https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=298134
--- Comment #1 from Mark Johnston <[email protected]> --- Why exactly do we need a separate syntax and filed type for sockets? That is, why can't the user just configure a unix socket as a log destination without specifying it as a unix socket? I don't object to the current implementation but would like to understand the rationale a bit better. Why does casper return a dirfd to the sandboxed process instead of just returning a connected socket? I think F_SOCK should be F_UNIXSOCK or similar. Otherwise it sounds like F_SOCK might be used for forwarding messages as well. BTW, for reviews it is easier to use phabricator. The change to make TypeNames use designated array initializers should be its own patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
