On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:45:09AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Stijn Hoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't know when X gained the capability to decipher this on its own, but > > I know that lots of people were running with 75dpi on 100dpi monitors, > > resulting in horrible default fonts etc. One of the problems with webpages > > in *nix vs Windows, differing fontsizes, is caused by exactly this. > > X will correctly determine the physical resolution on DDC-capable > monitors (with a DDC-capable graphics adapter, of course). Otherwise, > it assumes 75dpi. You can of course specify the correct resolution on > the command line, or (better yet) specify the display dimensions in > the configuration file and let X figure out the resolution.
Yeah, I discovered that earlier in this thread. A nifty feature. The
thing I was arguing against is the default of 75dpi in the absence of
DDC (I run into this because of a crappy KVM switch).
However, having no substantial evidence as to the common monitorsize
and screen resolution, I don't know anymore whether it should be
changed.
> BTW, back in the bad old days before Xft, X had 75dpi and 100dpi
> renderings of most fonts and no good way to adapt those to
> intermediate resolutions. This is still the case for the most
> commonly used monospace fonts.
And like I wrote earlier, IMHO the TTF fonts are so much nicer than
the 75dpi and 100dpi ones, that I promptly deinstall those two everywhere
I can. But this is clearly a matter of personal preference.
--Stijn
--
There are of course many problems connected with life, of which some of
the most popular are 'Why are people born?', 'Why do they die?', and
`Why do they spend so much of the intervening time wearing digital
watches?'
-- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy"
pgpNRQznuMiLt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
