On Dec 13, 2007 12:20 AM, Marc Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No I am not, the gpl is a thing and I save my spleen for people. The > thing that pisses me off is that the FSF and their minions > deliberately and knowingly lie about what the terms and conditions are > on the license they falsely call free. Face it when you redefine > common words in the English language to mean something that is found > in no dictionary or daily use and in point of fact contradicts at > least one of the main uses of the word, ie meaning with out cost or > encumbrance, you are willingly lieing through your fucking teeth and > you know it.
An 'encumbrance is a legal term of art for anything that affects or limits the title of a property, such as mortgages, leases, easements, liens, or restrictions. Also, those considered as potentially making the title defeasible are also encumbrances. For example, charging orders, building orders and structure alteration. encumbrance \en-KUHM-brun(t)s\, noun: 1. A burden, impediment, or hindrance. 2. A lien, mortgage, or other financial claim against a property. So, what Marc is saying is he would LIKE to encumbrance GPL software, and affect or limit the title of a property.. and inforce a burden, impediment, or hindrance on all software. WoW....... Isn't this what Gates wanted done to the user groups of the early 80's ? > > I am not compelled to do do anything as I avoid the entire family of > gnu licenses except as an end user, so they get nothing and I can > still use their software <hahaha> > If there were more people like you it would be a 100% MS world.. then im sure you could inflict encumbrance on all of us right? > > stop projecting. You are free to have the last word... I'm done playing now :D > > marc > > > > > Tom > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
