Charlie Kester wrote: > On Wed 03 Feb 2010 at 11:29:14 PST Chuck Robey wrote: >> >> I asked for all opinions, but I need to answer here before my thread gets >> hijacked. I DON'T WANT GUI-less operation, I don't want random >> playback. I >> really do appreciate your response, but what I'm after is the best >> possible mp3 >> player GUI for managing the creation and manipulation of playlist >> driven playback. >> >> The only possible reason I have for replying here is to avoid getting >> all >> thouse responses from folks who don't like GUIs. Hell, I'm usually in >> that >> camp, but not this time. The suggestion I got for musicpd is a player >> with lots >> of hooks into GUIs (according to the email) but my playback already works >> excellently, what I'm after is the GUI, not the server. >> >> I've had some great suggestions so far. I think I'll go try amarok >> first, and maybe rhythmbox next. You folks are REALLY helpful, >> thanks!! > > Sorry, I didn't mean to hijack your thread! > Amarok is very popular and is a good choice, despite what someone said > about the latest version having a case of featuritis. The older 1.4 > version from ports is quite good. A little heavier in resource usage > than rhythmbox or exaile, but it's a solid implementation with no > missing features. > It handles my favorite podcasts correctly too, so there's no need to > pair it with PenguinTV. And it includes an equalizer, something I've > sorely missed in Rhythmbox and Exaile. > I had some m3u playlists with bad path info for some of the tracks. Wih > amarok, I was able to drag the track from my "Collection" and drop it in > the imported playlist. The m3u file was automatically updated with the > correct info. Now that's cool!
Now that's helpful, thanks! Geeze, I can't count the number of times I've gone back, realized I was being sarcastic, trimmed that out, and avoided gross embarrassment when it's been subsequently proved that *I* was wrong. This time, I came too close to accusing you of hijacking ... but my rereading rule saved my ass again. I was more trying to make sure it *didn't* happen, and *not* saying you did it, which (as a matter of fact) you didn't. I tried both rhythmbox and quodlibet, they both failed to build, and I didn't get a chance to see what the real problem is yet. Audacious comes next, then (maybe, if audacious fails) amarok. I'm going to keep your name around & about, you certainly know more than I about music. > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
