On Tue Aug 3 10, Zane C.B. wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:41:51 +0000 > Alexander Best <[email protected]> wrote: > > > hi there, > > > > i just stumpled upon this article over at phoronix which benchmarks > > ZFS ATA vs. ZFS CAM ATA on freebsd 8.1 [1]. it seems read > > performance is really low when CAM ATA is enabled. i remember > > phoronix being famous for posting stupid benchmarks (RELASE vs. > > HEAD and such). however their benchmark results in this example > > seem to be valid. > > > > any comments on that? has performance of ATA CAM increased in HEAD? > > would a UFS2+S+SUJ ATA vs. UFS2+S+SUJ CAM ATA also show equal > > results? > > Not sure about any speed increases with ATA_CAM, but I for one > controller I have in this system I did get a massive boost and a end > to annoying disk issues with AHCI.
just noticed somebody started a new discuccion about the article i mention on freebsd-questions@ [1]. cheers. alex [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg236201.html -- a13x _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
