On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <[email protected]>wrote:
> Joe Nosay <[email protected]> writes: > > > I've had to rewrite the paths on h, c, and cc files for the build to > > continue. The assumption, and hopefully not a faulty one, is that the > port > > Makefile can be edited so that any build from the Google Chrome Framework > > can be ported to FreeBSD. Fewer files than thought of need to be changed; > > and, even on the ChromeOS build, I have noticed that vfs.h references can > > be replaced with NFS references- it's basically the same thing, which may > > be good if someone is interested in having a ChromeOS Linux compatibility > > layer. > > > > Will the assumption work; and, if so, then what parts will I need to work > > on? > > I couldn't really understand your question. Can you post an example of a > change you had to make? > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chromium > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected] > " > The project- which has become replicating the environment to run on FreeBSD- is being moved into a jail. I am not sure as to the method that Google uses to search for the libraries, binaries, and such. What I can do is use the full path - /$SYSROOT/$USR_PATH/$FILE- to let the c and h files find what is needed. ChromiumOS, Chromium Browser, and Android (environment and SDK) can be ported and worked from the FreeBSD system. Input data locations need to be modified as well as the build to use CLang in place of GCC. This will be the FreeBSD developers' environment that Google did not set up. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chromium To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
