On May 31, 2005, at 10:01 AM, Brad Davis wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:20:59AM -0400, steve Rieger wrote:
On May 31, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster
with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is
ext_if="fxp0"
internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }"
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 ->
$internal_smtp_servers round-robin sticky-address
If 10.0.0.4 port 25 goes down, how do I force pf to remove 10.0.0.4
from its table.
Regards
Sunil Sunder Raj
check out vrrp
VRRP is for redundant routers.
Regards,
Brad Davis
mr brad davis,
whilst i am not here to yell at you.
you have no idea what you are talking about.
i work for one of the largest stock exchanges in the world and we use
vrrp on 73 servers to server apache
vrrp was invented by cisco and they use it on their load balancers but
as somebody already said rtfm dude.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
