On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:23:50PM +0100, Ross Draper wrote: > CARP - Pro's: stable and built into the kernel. Could enable acive/active > arp load sharing at a later point. > Cons: There is a Freebsd bug (I've seen it discussed on the lists where > the creation and destroyal of a carp interface causes a kernel panic.
I use it without panics half year. How many carp interfaces must be configured for reproduce panic? Is net.inet.carp.preempt used? > Also, there is no support for start/stop scripts. Use ports/net/ifstated for run init scripts. > Freevrrpd - Pros: Mac address changing removes some of the arp timeout > issues/gratuitus arp problems and it supports start/stop scripts > Cons: I'm finding that upon rebooting the backup unit it correctly starts > as a backup, then three seconds later syslogs that it is the master and > changes its mac address accordingly. although a sniff of the network > traffic indicates it is sending the right advertisements, it never goes > into backup mode again. Look like you have same "priority" on both nodes. It's work only with CARP. WBR. Dmitriy _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
