Kazutaka YOKOTA scribbled this message on Jul 24:
> 
> >> I am afraid this is not quite right.
> >> 
> >> Bruce, Doug and I are currently in discussion to fix this.
> >
> >Hrm.  Why does the AXP cons.c track udev_t while the x86 verson
> >doesn't?  As best as I can tell, the AXP doesn't seem to need it any
> >more than the x86 does, unless I've missed something.
> 
> As dev_t is now a struct, we cannot track dev_t for SYSCTL.  It has to
> be udev_t.  sys/i386/i386/cons.c should be doing the same as the alpha
> version, rather than vice versa.  
> 
> To quote Bruce: "alpha/alpha/cons.c should be identical with
> i386/i386/cons.c and not in a machine-dependent place.  All current
> differences are bugs" :-)

hmmm.. guess it's time for me to bring out my MI cons.c that I did a
long time ago and dust it off??  Bruce kinda vetoed it, but I also didn't
have the courage to commit it back then...  and it's not hard to make
it MI....

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney                              Voice: +1 541 684 8449
  Cu Networking                                   P.O. Box 5693, 97405

  "The soul contains in itself the event that shall presently befall it.
  The event is only the actualizing of its thought." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to