In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ville-Pertti Keinonen writ
es:
n>Actual use obviously shouldn't include cached data. Can you say off
>the top of your head whether v_holdcnt applies to anything other than
>v_cache_src and non-VM buffer-cache (struct buf) stuff?
Sorry, no, can't answer without looking.
>If not, then v_usecount == 0 could be considered non-use without
>worrying about v_holdcnt, since most vnodes with cached data are going
>to have an associated vm_object holding a real reference.
>
>> >BTW: You still haven't committed the v_id patch I sent you in May. Is
>> >there any specific reason for this?
>>
>> I seem to remember we stalled on some detail which wouldn't or
>> couldn't work was it NFS ?
>
>No, there was a completely unrelated NFS bug I ran into while looking
>into it (which has been fixed), the last comment from you seemed to
>imply that you were going to commit the patch.
Sorry, we must have missed each other. I understood that since
NFS held "soft references" it was pointless. Send me the patch
again and lets resume that one.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message