On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tom Bartol >writes: > : IIRC it does update uptime properly after a suspend in 2.2.8 but does not > : do so in 3.X and -current on my ThinkPad 770. > > define correctly. Eg, if I suspend for an hour it adds an hour? > > Warner > Yeah, that's what I meant by "correctly". I don't recall seeing a "thundering herd" effect afterwards. Hmmm... which reminds me, I believe this was not stock 2.2.8 but rather 2.2.8-PAO. I had thought that the lion's share of PAO code got merged into 3.0-current at some point. When I tried 3.0-current after this merge, suspend and resume worked fine on my 770 with the exception of uptime. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: Serious server-side NFS problem Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Nate Williams
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Peter Wemm
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Warner Losh
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Warner Losh
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Tom Bartol
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Warner Losh
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Tom Bartol
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Warner Losh
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Tom Bartol
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Mike Smith
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Nate Williams
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Andrew Kenneth Milton
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Kevin Day
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Serious server-side NFS pr... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Serious server-side NFS problem Andrew Gallatin
- Re: Serious server-side NFS problem Doug Rabson