On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 01:58:14PM -0600, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> > **** TAKE THIS TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] *****
> Agreed. This is where the depth of the discussion should take place.
>
> > This is NOT a -current issue!!
> I beg to differ. Any significant change to the status-quo is a -current issue.
>
> To adopt ANY SIGNIFICANT CHANGE without widespread public notice is just
> inviting grumblings of "backroom politics". Just see what happens if the City
> Council votes to close Main Street and explains " this was discussed at a Public
> Hearing before the Public Works Commission"
>
> And some of us, myself included, are advocating making FreeBSD into a small set
> of ports!
>
> I guess that doesn't affect very many people :-)
You are very wrong. We are not "adopting significant change", we are discussing
possibilities. Discussions related to ports/packages belong on freebsd-ports.
Please read the mail charters.
--
Bill Fumerola - Network Architect
Computer Horizons Corp - CVM
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 800-252-2421 x128 / Cell: 248-761-7272
PS. The reason that "Public Works Commissions" of the world exist is because
City Councils trust their departments to make informed reccomendations.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
