::
::Correct me if I'm wrong, but using MAP_STACK|MAP_GUARDED
::would allocate one additional guard page for each threads
::stack.
::
::DanE.
:
: Correct. At the moment MAP_GUARDED is a 'generic' guarding flag
: and makes no assumptions about the areas being adjoining. It doesn't
: cost us anything.
Hmm. The more I think about it, the more I dislike what I just said.
I think I am going to change it to just guard the first N pages and not
guard both the first and the last N pages.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Alan Cox
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED avail... Jason Evans
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED a... Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED avail... Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Daniel Eischen
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED available Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED avail... Daniel Eischen
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED a... Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED avail... Matthew Dillon
- Re: tentitive complete patch for MAP_GUARDED a... Matthew Dillon
