Just curious as to why share/emacs and share/emacs/site-lisp are created by
BSD.local.dist instead of by the emacs ports which might want to use them?
It's not a big deal, but it seems to me that these aren't useful for the
general case of someone not wanting to install an emacs port (strange as that
may sound [1]). I suspect it's for historical reasons, but it doesnt mean it
can't be removed if sufficient time is deemed to have passed.
Kris
[1] Please, no editor wars :-)
--- BSD.local.dist Thu Dec 24 01:54:29 1998
+++ BSD.local.dist~ Sun Feb 7 21:18:23 1999
@@ -168,10 +168,6 @@
..
doc
..
- emacs
- site-lisp
- ..
- ..
examples
..
misc
-----
(ASP) Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) announced today that the release of its
productivity suite, Office 2000, will be delayed until the first quarter
of 1901.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
