:> Now we have /etc/defaults/rc.conf, /etc/rc.conf, and /etc/rc.conf.local.
:> Considerably less simple and quite unobvious.
:
:Erm... I thought that the point of /etc/defaults/rc.conf was that one
:wouldn't touch it, and only work with rc.conf?
:
:(Haven't looked at the change myself, as my test machine is dead at the
:moment)
:
:[email protected] - Shave A Tree Today! (TM)
Yah... kinda like nobody is supposed to touch /etc/rc, eh?
/etc/rc - no touchee
/etc/rc.conf - no touchee
/etc/rc.local - touchees
/etc/rc.conf.local - touchees
That seems pretty obvious to me.
I'm still partial to my /etc/rc.conf.N idea, where /etc/rc.conf.0
is a no-touchee and /etc/rc.conf.9 is the 'user can do whatever he wants
with this file' touchee. The site configurator would mess with
/etc/rc.conf.2. A post-install gui configurator would mess with
either /etc/rc.conf.2 or /etc/rc.conf.3.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[email protected]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
