Besides, I can not imagine the base system is going to track egcs. At some point we will have a newer egcs port and the older system compiler, much as it was before. At least that is my take on things.
Tom Veldhouse ve...@visi.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org]on Behalf Of Jeremy Lea > Sent: Sunday, April 04, 1999 6:11 PM > To: David O'Brien > Cc: Chuck Robey; freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: egcs > > > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 04, 1999 at 04:02:28PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > what's the name of the system compiler going to be, egcs or > gcc, or cc? > > > And the C++ one? > > > > No change in names. cc/gcc and c++/g++/CC > > Experience says there are a lot of ports which look for egcc and eg++, > so it might be nice to add these (and all the other names used for the > port) as hardlinks. Won't cost anything (well a few bytes...), and also > will help with the depends checking on ports. > > Regards, > -Jeremy > > -- > | "I could be anything I wanted to, but one things true > --+-- Never gonna be as big as Jesus, never gonna hold the world > in my hand > | Never gonna be as big as Jesus, never gonna build a promised land > | But that's, that's all right, OK with me..." -Audio Adrenaline > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
