At 09:58 AM 4/9/99 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Compile Jade with "-g" and see where in the coredump the signal 11 is
> occuring.  What does ``ldd jade'' show?  You might be mixing shared libs,
> that doesn't work for C++.  Could also be an exceptions problem.  Try
> compiling with -fnoexpcetions.

[asmo...@daemon] (163) $ ldd /usr/local/bin/jade
/usr/local/bin/jade:
        libstyle.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libstyle.so.1 (0x280b6000)
        libspgrove.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libspgrove.so.1 (0x282ac000)
        libgrove.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libgrove.so.1 (0x282ef000)
        libsp.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libsp.so.1 (0x282f7000)
        libintl.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.1 (0x284ce000)
        libstdc++.so.3 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 (0x284d2000)
        libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x2850d000)
        libc.so.3 => /usr/lib/libc.so.3 (0x28527000)

I know for certain that libintl is gcc.

Will go and do recompilations of all stuff this weekend *sigh*  ;)


In my case (it seems all libs compiled under egcs - exactly when jade
compiled):

/usr/local/bin/jade:
       libstyle.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libstyle.so.1 (0x280b9000)
       libspgrove.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libspgrove.so.1 (0x282b6000)
       libgrove.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libgrove.so.1 (0x282f9000)
       libsp.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libsp.so.1 (0x28301000)
       libstdc++.so.3 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.3 (0x284e4000)
       libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x28521000)
       libc.so.3 => /usr/lib/libc.so.3 (0x2853c000)



The Only way I could get Jade to work with the new compiler
was with CFLAGS= -O -pipe
The only way I have tested it is by building the Handbook
-O2 -pipe built ,but  Signal 11
-O2 -fno-exceptions won't build

Manfred
=====================
||    man...@pacbell.net       ||
||    Ph. (415) 681-6235        ||
=====================


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to