"John R. LoVerso" wrote:
>
> > Right or wrong, you forgot:
> >
> > 5. BSD tradition.
> >
> > Case 5 justifies Fortran.
>
> By that logic, you'd also have to add a Pascal compiler to the base system.
Does gcc has a Pascal? :-)
I think we have a Pascal doc under share.
> Neither makes much sense when they can both be ports (or packages) easily
> addable at install or compile time by the small % of the FreeBSD population
> that
> will actually use them.
You are taking for granted the easyness. g77 is part of egcs.
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
d...@freebsd.org
"nothing better than the ability to perform cunning linguistics"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
