How do,
-hackers was silent about this, so I'm resending it to -current. Any
comments before I commit this (trivial) change?
N
==
docs/11589 says that programs that include aio.h also need to include
sys/time.h.
I've had a chat with Terry Lambert, who wrote the aio_read.2 manual page,
who says
<snip>
> And here is a section from the aio.h manual page (from the
> Single UNIX Specification):
>
> Inclusion of the <aio.h> header may make visible symbols
> defined in the headers <fcntl.h>, <signal.h>, <sys/types.h>
> and <time.h>.
>
> Basically, this means that the aio.h header is *defined* as
> including sys/types.h (because of off_t and size_t), and is
> defined as either including the other headers as well (bad)
> or as forward declaring some types as opaque:
<snip>
> Since the Single UNIX Specification make no note of a header
> other than aio.h, I'm afraid that the answer is that the aio.h
> must include these headers, or directly define the respective
> types itself.
>
> While I dislike promiscuous headers, I believe it is better to
> be able to compile and run standards compliant UNIX code.
So I want to apply the following very trivial patch;
Index: aio.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/sys/aio.h,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 aio.h
--- aio.h 1999/01/17 22:33:08 1.9
+++ aio.h 1999/06/01 17:57:36
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#ifndef _SYS_AIO_H_
#define _SYS_AIO_H_
+#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/signal.h>
Any objections? I know nothing about the aio* stuff at all, which is
why I'm checking first.
N
--
[intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed,
non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs
the links.
-- Tom Christiansen in <37514...@cs.colorado.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
