Garrett Wollman writes: > > Should the kernel insure that ifr->ifr_addr.sa_len is always at > > least sizeof(ifr->ifr_addr), or should the user programs adjust > > their pointer increment algorithm? At first I assumed the latter > > answer (patches below) but now am not so sure. > > The user programs should not use SIOCGIFCONF.
I was hoping for a little more information than that. OK, imagine a world where you had no choice. THEN what would the answer be? In other words, I'd like to fix the problem but I don't have time to rewrite arp, natd, route, etc. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
