Roman Divacky wrote:

I would like to propose to integrate clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD
in the near future (days, not weeks).

clang/LLVM is a C/C++/ObjC compiler (framework) which aims to possibly
replace gcc. It is BSDL-like licensed. The sources are ~45MB (the
svn checkout is 97MB). Clang/LLVM is written in C++.

Clang can compile all of FreeBSD on i386/amd64 including world and booting
kernel. Other architectures that are close to working are MIPS, PowerPC
and ARM. We have a branch (clangbsd-import) that just includes clang/LLVM
sources and the build infrastructure and this is what we aim to integrate
at first.
The import of clang/LLVM was discussed at the toolchain summit May 10th
but I would like to hear your opinion. I got approval from core@ on
importing it.

So please share your support or resistance to the idea of importing clang.

Roman Divacky
I've been waiting for this day since the first talk of PCC. I've watched ClangBSD on the FreeBSD wiki since it first appeared there and I'm delightfully surprised to see that it has progressed to this stage so quickly (what, has it only been 6 months or a year?). Clang also seems to have made a lot of progress (and quickly!) on their C++ support. I'm all for the import. I think you'll receive a wider user base of ClangBSD (including me) if you import it. Actually, the day it's imported and reported stable enough, I'll almost certainly sync to CURRENT Otherwise, there is no incentive for me since there isn't anything in CURRENT I'm curious about (yet).

The only thing that concerns me, as was discussed extensively in your previous thread, are bugs in a relatively new compiler. Robert Watson's post is especially disturbing as he spent 4-6 hours determining that a problem was caused by a bug in the compiler. That's a lot of time spent. However, this will help mature LLVM/Clang which will benefit FreeBSD anyways. If LLVM/Clang is cutting-edge compiler technology, I'd have to agree that this will be the future anyways. Besides, LLVM/Clang offers all sorts of interesting developer tools and Clang itself appears to generate more useful and informative error messages and warnings than GCC ever did (with color too!). I think that alone is worth it.

Best Regards,
Nathan Lay
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to ""

Reply via email to