On 11.06.10 21:56, M. Warner Losh wrote:
"M. Warner Losh"<i...@bsdimp.com> writes:
: In message:<20100611185237.gl56...@hoeg.nl>
: Ed Schouten<e...@80386.nl> writes:
: : Hello Andreas,
: : * Andreas Tobler<andreast-l...@fgznet.ch> wrote:
: :> I have a sparc64 machine which is quite slow. And for my purpose I
: :> do not need CLANG etc. atm.
: : Clang is not enabled on sparc64, so there is no need to disable
: : anything. If you do want to disable Clang on i386, amd64, pc98 or
: : powerpc, add WITHOUT_CLANG=yes to /etc/src.conf, as described in
: : src.conf(5).
: Except that clang isn't quite disabled when cross-building, due to the
: issue I pointed out when the commit went in wrt bsd.own.mk.
: MACHINE_ARCH is still amd64 until we start to build the sparc64
: binaries, so anything in the bootstrapping part of the build will not
: be disabled. that's one of many reasons disabling things in
: bsd.own.mk based on architecture is going to fail.
And even if you add WITHOUT_CLANG to your src.conf, we still always
build some of the clang infrastructure in the bootstrap tools
phase... But we have to do that to avoid getting not being able to
build clang on an architecture that doesn't have it for an
architecture that does.
I can confirm that. I just set up a build for powerpc with WITHOUT_CLANG
and in the first building steps I saw this.
I don't care if it is only a few minutes of building time, but I
disagree if it is going to be > 10 minutes/hours in case of multilib
builds (32-bit libs and 64-bit libs) as it is on powerpc64. On powerpc64
the WITHOUT_CLANG helped to avoid the build of the multilib.
I do not have anything against CLANG. I only want to be able to steer
what I want.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"