On Jun 18, 2010, at 2:08 AM, oizs wrote: > I've seen people with the same configuration doing 160MB/s writes and > 250MB/s+ reads with raid5 so I still think something isn't right.
How is that being measured? > And using raid10 with 4 disks is a rather large waste of capacity. If you value performance and reliability more than cost, RAID-10 is a better choice. If you value cost more than performance, RAID-5 is what you use. See: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-March/116122.html Regards, -- -Chuck _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
