On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:51:34 +0200 Marco van Lienen <marco+freebsd-curr...@lordsith.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:25:56PM +0200, you (Stefan Bethke) sent > the following to the -current list: > > Am 17.07.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Marco van Lienen: > > > > > # zpool list pool1 > > > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > > > pool1 5.44T 147K 5.44T 0% ONLINE - > > ... > > > zfs list however only shows: > > > # zfs list pool1 > > > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > > > pool1 91.9K 3.56T 28.0K /pool1 > > > > > > I just lost the space of an entire hdd! > > > > zpool always shows the raw capacity (without redundancy), zfs the > > actual available capacity. > > I have read many things about those differences, but why then does > zfs on opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does > not? That would imply that my friend running osol build 117 couldn't > fill up his raidz pool past the 3.56T. If you compare the yfs list output of OSol and FreeBSD and they differ where they shouldn't, you should have a look if compression and/or deduplication (were available) is activated. Bye, Alexander. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
