Em 2010.07.24. 6:19, Doug Barton escreveu:
There are several places in portmaster where I use '[e]grep -ql <foo>' to signal existence of something without having to deal with the output of grep. In oldgrep this worked as advertised. In bsdgrep it doesn't.

Furthermore, looking at the code it doesn't seem like it's a trivial fix since you seem to be conflating the idea of -q with "don't output the matching lines" instead of "don't output anything" which is what the old one did:

                case 'l':
                        Lflag = false;
                        lflag = qflag = true;
                        break;

Also, looking at the code it's not clear to me that the -q option has its previous behavior of halting processing for that file on the first match, but I've only given it a quick look.

So, request number 1, fix it so that bsdgrep -ql doesn't output anything, and make sure that -q actually halts processing on the first match.
Of course both this and the color issue will be fixed.

Request number 2, think about whether or not introducing this as the default was the right course of action. I held my tongue on this when you committed it, but in the past when such things have been added they start life as an option, allowing those who choose to do so to regression test them. Once they've had a shakeout period THEN the switch is flipped to make them the default. I'm not at the point yet where I'm ready to ask for you to change this, but between the color thing and this issue, that ball has started to roll, in my mind at least. We'll see what happens with more testing.
This change was thoroughly tested on pointyhat and by several interested people even by you. Actually, the compatibility for non-standard GNU regexes were added when you requested it after trying out with portmaster. Why didn't you tell me earlier about this bug then, as well?

Gabor
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to