"C. P. Ghost" <cpgh...@cordula.ws> writes: > After all LISP-like syntax is *still* more common and prevalent > than Lua, e.g. in Elisp, guile, esh, scsh and a lot of other apps > that use it as a small language. So we can expect more users > to be at least partially familiar with it. And there *are* lightweight > MIT- or BSD-licensed scheme interpreters out there too:
Considering that the majority of people who might be interested in using this know *neither* Lisp *nor* Lua, my vote is for Lua, because people who are familiar with neither will be more open to learning Lua, which resembles other languages they already know, than Lisp, which doesn't. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
