On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:38, David DEMELIER <demelier.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > A lot of ports will need some patches then, isn't it ?
Most were taken care of back when it happened - many either included utmp.h and never used it or only used it trivially, so it was easy to fix (I submitted patches for some and I'm definitely not a great programmer). So the fact that it wasn't fixed either means nobody cares about that port (somewhat true here - most of the KDE people moved on to 4) or that the fix will be more involved (probably the case for this one). -- Rob Farmer _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
