On Monday 06 December 2010 02:09 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 06/12/2010 21:01 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > > :-) Don't get me wrong, I generally agree with you *iff* it does > > : not > > > > hurt too much. Anyway, this issue should be resolved from the > > root, i.e., kern_resouce.c, if possible. > > But what to resolve there?
Better algorithm for stat. > I just want to always have a stable source "cpu ticks", and then > everything else should just work? If we had one, yes. But we don't, at least for old x86 hardware. :-( > BTW, if someone comes up with a patch for more or less correct > accounting when "cpu ticks" frequency is allowed to change, then I > am all for it. But, IMO, it's just easier to use stable "cpu > ticks". If it doesn't hurt too much, yes. Remember the P-state invariant CPUs are pretty new. SMP-correct TSC is quite rare if there is any. Jung-uk Kim _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
