On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Dan Papasian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000302 18:17] wrote:
> > While this may sound crazy, I was tired of 'which' taking a long
> > time to complete on my 486 dx4/100 when it was under extereme
> > pressure, so I rewrote it in C :)
> >
>
> ...snip
>
> > NOTE:
> > This version of which has exactly the same behavior.
> > Also, the above test was not performed when the box was
> > under load.. and on slower machines/under load, the
> > differences are of course, more noticable.
> > You may all go ahead and call me crazy now.
> >
> > ...I've got the fear of posting the source, but what the heck,
> > getting nitpicked is good education :)
> >
> > http://bugg.strangled.net/which.c
> >
> > Any flames^Wthoughts?
>
> It doesn't seem to handle multiple arguments. File a PR and fix
> the issues and I'll look at getting it into post 4.0.
Hey Alfred, what Perl program is he talking about? Which is a builtin for
csh and tcsh (my shells). Or is he talking about some other 'which'?
>
> -Alfred
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | electronics, communications, and signal processing.
New Year's Resolution: I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up
fictitious words in the dictionary.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
