On 24 Jan 2011, at 06:16, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <si...@nitro.dk> wrote: >> Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of cvsup-master >> instead if that makes it more useful? > > Can cvsup-master still lose atomicity of commits? I suspect it can,
Yes, there would not be a change in that - there is no simple way around that with current infrastructure (as fixing that wold mean doing evil hacks around cvs etc.) The only thing you would gain by using cvsup-master to pull sources is lower lag time between what tinderboxes build and what's in src/ VCS. > in which case syncing directly off the SVN master would seem a better > approach. Better yes, but that's not a simple configuration change like switching to using cvsup-master is, and unfortunately I have plenty of more interesting projects than changing tinderbox code :-). PS. for other people not being Peter Jeremy :) - no, I'm not going to consider git or going to consider discussing it - see above :-). -- Simon L. B. Nielsen _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
