>What process did you follow to get here? I did a make toolchain followed by make buildworld.
> that's because the latest gcc commits have support for core2 and thus it no > longer is being expanded to nocona. please note that having core2 in make.conf > has always been *wrong*. hence the need to reset it to nocona. > the best way to fix this would be to set CPUYTYPE?=native. if you want core2 > support now's the chance to actually get it. just update world and you can use > CPUTYPE?=core2 and this time it *really* is supported. ;) I saw the relevant commits about core2, this is the reason i decided to do a rebuild. I didn't know that core2 was wrong, it's in the make.conf documentation, "native" it's not and after serious googling i found out that i should actually avoid it. I always believed that core2 was there [make.conf] as a future proof upgrade path for when the base toolchain actually supports core2. So, should i use native cputype? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
