Vinícius Zavam wrote: > > > i'm still curious about things like CPUTYPE= and -march= configured as > native, gentlemen. > is it the "golden egg" to use with our system or not? why "natives" > aren't in the benchs? > > /me feels confused. > > > -- > Vinícius Zavam > profiles.google.com/egypcio >
Apparently -march=native would equal -march=core2 with 65nm generation Core2s, this is not the case with Penryns.. But there are none in the test? However, I agree that testing with -march=native would be simpler and more straightforward. regards, - Jakub Lach -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Compiler-Benchmark%3A-gcc-base-vs.-gcc-ports-vs.-clang-tp31119986p31138978.html Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
