2011/3/31 Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org>: > on 29/03/2011 23:29 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: >> ok let's try to say it simpler :) the main goal is to keep it simple >> for now, simple and rock solid, so that we can replace pkg_install and >> do some cleanup in the ports tree, add the "must have" features while >> doing that. And only when we will be ready for that and that portmgr >> have decided that it is mature enough to replace pkg_install, only >> after that we will start improving with new features and new changes. >> >> I thinks changing the package name scheme is not a "must have" >> feature, it for sure is and intresting feature, but what about pushing >> to after the first stable release? managing architecture as we plan to >> do it is enough imho. > > Oh, yes, I realize all this and totally agree with it. > Given how huge and how visible our ports and packages systems are, it's > better to > be slow and cautious. > All the ideas that I suggested were more for the "next step" than for now. >
And noted in my personnal TODO list :) > Thank you for the work! > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
