On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <p...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 01:36:32PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: >> [Not sure which list is most appropriate since it's using HAST + ZFS >> on -RELEASE, -STABLE, and -CURRENT. Feel free to trim the CC: on >> replies.] >> >> I'm having a hell of a time making this work on real hardware, and am >> not ruling out hardware issues as yet, but wanted to get some >> reassurance that someone out there is using this combination (FreeBSD >> + HAST + ZFS) successfully, without kernel panics, without core dumps, >> without deadlocks, without issues, etc. I need to know I'm not >> chasing a dead rabbit. > > I just committed a fix for a problem that might look like a deadlock. > With trociny@ patch and my last fix (to GEOM GATE and hastd) do you > still have any issues?
Just to confirm, this is commit r220264, 220265, 220266 to -CURRENT? Looking through the commit logs, I don't see any of these MFC'd to -STABLE yet, so I can't test them directly. The storage box that was having the issues is running 8-STABLE r219754 at the moment (with ZFSv28 and Mikolag's ggate patches). I see there have been a lot of hast/ggate-related MFCs in the past week, but they don't include the deadlock patches. Once the deadlock patches above are MFC'd to -STABLE, I can do an upgrade cycle and test them. I do have the previous 9-CURRENT install saved, just nothing to run it on atm. -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"