On 08/05/11 17:35, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I have installed 9-Beta1 using the new installation tool and I am
generally happy with it.
The new dialog cause me to need a few more key-strokes because I was
so used to the
old behavior, but it really is more intuitive and I would not want to
see the old behavior
restored. I'll get used to it soon.
I do have a couple of issues with the new installation tool, though.
1. After completing the partition design I am presented with the
option to "Save" the
partitions. It is not at all cleared that "Save" actually creates the
partitions and newfses
the file systems. I suggest changing "Save" to "Commit" or Execute".
These are far
clearer and more frightening. "Save" sounds too safe, not like you are
about to update
basic disk structure and may be about to make any data on the disk unusable.
Several people have commented on this, and I think it's a good point.
These buttons will hopefully have better names by BETA2.
2. I was installing 9 into an existing set of partitions. (I
understand that this is NOT
typical.) First the system asks me about adding a partition. Oops! I
selected the only
option that was not clearly wrong, "Cancel". I was not at all sure
that it was what I
wanted, but it was. I have no idea how to improve this and it's
probably not worth
spending much time think about it. But the next step was confusing.
I selected each of the existing partitions that I was going to use and
selected modify to
enter the name of the partition (/, /var, /usr, /tmp). I then quit and
selected the not
scarey "Save". I proceeded, but thought the "Save" was rather fast.
Then the install failed
because the partitions were already populated. I ended up re-booting
and then going
through each partition and deleting it and then selecting the slice
and creating it again.
While not a big deal, it seemed like the Modify to name the partitions
should have
triggered the newfs that was not done.
I think my first point is pretty important. The second is far less so.
This is, to some extent, a deliberate design decision. The idea is that
if you are installing onto an existing partition with the right type,
then you really do just want to use it without newfs. This mirrors the
behavior of similar utilities on other operating systems, and I think is
fairly intuitive. If you delete and re-add the partition, or change its
type in modify, then the installer knows that the filesystem state needs
to be new and will execute newfs. It's different from the old behavior,
but I think makes more sense.
The install went pretty well and I am generally very pleased with the
new installer. It's
certainly an improvement over the old one! Thanks to the folks who worked on it.
Thanks!
-Nathan
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
