On Sat Aug 13 11, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 13 August 2011 20:51, Alexander Best <arun...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > i just had the following idea: how about instead of copying the current 
> > kernel
> > to /boot/kernel.old and then installing the new one under /boot/kernel as 
> > the
> > results of target installkernel, we create a unique directory name for the 
> > old
> > kernel?
> >
> > something like /boot/kernel-r${revision}-${/dev/random}?
> >
> > that would let people not only boot the previous kernel, but all kernels 
> > that
> > have been replaced by target installkernel. this would make tracking issues,
> > which have been introduced by a certain commit much easier, imho.
> >
> > i don't think implementing this logic would be that difficult. the only 
> > problem
> > i see is with ${/dev/random} in the case where people are running a kernel
> > without /dev/{u}random support.
> >
> > cheers.
> > alex
> 
> mktemp?

ahh. nice. unless mktemp(1) relies on  "device random", that sounds like a good
solution. :)

> 
> Chris
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to