On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > This website should be brushed up or taken offline! > > It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html > > I think this one would better look like list of major features with os > comparison, like: > > = Networking = > * IPv6: major support, best stack around. > * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e. > ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet). > > = Data storage = > * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux > has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has > dynamic disks since XP (?features). > > = SMP = > * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some > rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like > DragonflyBSD and QNX). >
And USB. I believe there are significant changes in the USB subsystems which those who are making performance benchmarks completely fail to mention. --HPS _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
