On 10/25/2011 14:45, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Doug Barton
>> Actually hex would still work since 0x.... would match. :)
>
> Yes, but if in the future, a revision number format is ever chosen
> that doesn't include
> 0x at the beginning, and is something like:
> a23728ea7d592acc69b36875a482cdf3fd5c8d
>
> then this check would fail. However, none of this
> exists yet in SVN, so it is not worth worry about
> right now.
Yes, that was what the smiley at the end of my sentence above was
intending to convey. Sorry I wasn't more clear. :)
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
