On 11/04/11 20:35, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Friday, November 04, 2011 a las 08:19:12PM +0100, Armin Pirkovitsch
escribió:
ports/security/p11-kit (requested by ports/graphics/evince via gnome)
does not build:
Just wondering - have you looked at UPDATING? - especially:
20110928:
AFFECTS: users of 10-current
AUTHOR: [email protected]
There are known issues installing ports on FreeBSD 10+ due to
bogus assumptions by various build scripts. This will not be fixed
until 9-RELEASE is released.
...
I have read this and I have in /etc/make.conf the following lines:
# From: "b. f."<[email protected]>
# To: [email protected], [email protected]
# Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:42:50 -0400
#
# No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r
# and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them;
# or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE
# (which is implied by USE_AUTOTOOLS and GNU_CONFIGURE). Right now the
# masquerading is probably safer, because there are some problems with
# the fix that are still being resolved -- and a few ports that may fail
# despite the fix. But of course if you help to test without
# masquerading, these problems will be resolved sooner.
#
WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1
and most of the ports I'm using are compiling now; the port mentioned
here does not (not even with UNAME_r) and I wanted to bring this to the
attention of the maintainer and others;
Would have been useful if you had written that in the first place I guess...
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
