On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/11/16 Xin LI <delp...@delphij.net>: >> Just my $0.02 -- I think we should probably do it in a more >> centralized place -- otherwise in case someone imported some new code, >> they have to do the same defined(__FreeBSD__) || >> defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__)? > > How about something like: > > #if defined(__FreeBSD__) && !defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) > #define __FreeBSD_kernel__ > #endif > > it can be placed at beginning of each header, then the rest becomes > much simpler. > > Note this has the side-effect of defining __FreeBSD_kernel__ on > FreeBSD, which I suspect some people won't be fond of. An alternative > could be to come up with an ad-hoc macro that means "this system is > either FreeBSD or uses the same kernel as FreeBSD" and define it where > needed.
I had a similar suggestion... Why do you think people wouldn't be fond of the __FreeBSD_kernel__ being defined? Warner _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
