On 11/28/2011 16:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <4ed4222e.5010...@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton writes:
>> On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
>
>>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
>>> default?
>>
>> Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
>> system for at least a decade.
>>
>> Ideally we could do this for 9.0.
>
> Can we at least keep one (small) library compiled for profiling, so
> that compiling for profiling doesn't get broken by accident ?
I think WITH_PROFILE is probably a good idea for the tinderbox?
--
"We could put the whole Internet into a book."
"Too practical."
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
