on 02/12/2011 06:36 John Baldwin said the following: > Ah, ok (I had thought SCHEDULER_STOPPED was going to always be true when kdb > was > active). But I think these two changes should cover critical_exit() ok. >
I attempted to start a discussion about this a few times already :-) Should we treat kdb context the same as SCHEDULER_STOPPED context (in the current definition) ? That is, skip all locks in the same fashion? There are pros and contras. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"