Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just upgraded my production server to the 4.0-RELEASE and found that > squid23 when compiled with -Os option dying with signal 11 on each attempt to > load page. When I recompiled it with -O fault disappeared. Which brings us back to the popular topic of which optimization levels are reliable. Building 5.0-CURRENT with "-Os -mpentium" failed for me with gas complaining (unknown opcode I think, but don't hold me to it). I went back to "-O -mpentium" and that worked fine. On another machine, "-O2 -mpentiumpro" worked, too. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Dan Nelson
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Donn Miller
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_... Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) David O'Brien
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_... Dan Nelson
- Re[2]: gcc -Os optimisation broken (... Maxim Sobolev
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Christian Weisgerber
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_... Donn Miller
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (REL... David O'Brien
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken... Christian Weisgerber
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: gcc -Os optimisatio... Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (REL... Doug Barton
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken... Sascha Schumann
- Re: gcc -Os optimisation br... R Joseph Wright
- Re: gcc -Os optimisatio... Thomas Köllmann