-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/04/12 17:49, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi, Xin-- > > On Jan 4, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Xin Li wrote: >> I am personally quite convinced that FreeBSD should make such >> change though -- having more than 64K of outstanding and >> unhandled connections does not sound a great idea (i.e. it's not >> a connection limit after all, but the pending handle connection. >> If my math were right, 64K connections would require about 1Gbps >> bandwidth in and out if they happen in the same second.) But I >> agree this would be a good stress test, which might expose some >> bugs we don't know today. > > I think I agree with the change from a correctness standpoint-- > listen(2) accepts an int backlog argument. > > I'm not convinced that there are many scenarios where needing to > exceed a listen queue backlog of 64K would be beneficial to a > real-world system, and I am sure there are many scenarios where it > would be counterproductive, but folks can adjust kern.ipc.somaxconn > as they see fit and perhaps Dan or others would gain some value > from it.
Ah sorry that should read something like "I'm not quite convinced" and as you see I were explaining why in detail but apparently I missed to check the spellings... Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delp...@delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8FBZkACgkQOfuToMruuMDQqQCfWPenaWKpC41i8CXJeuFPlAzg y/cAnR2zTBCa1qG3/0G/nP/vDbQ5Z3vp =lGcl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
