On Monday, February 27, 2012 2:03:21 pm Scott Long wrote:
> 
> On Feb 27, 2012, at 3:45 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> 
> > on 30/01/2012 18:59 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >> 
> >> First, I think that this proposal/discussion could have been more useful 
> >> before
> >> the 9.0.  Maybe the RE would be interested in adding another item to their
> >> pre-release checklist: ask developers about what could be dropped and what 
> >> should
> >> be added to the Safe Mode settings in a new (.0) release.  Probably the 
> >> developers
> >> should keep the Safe Mode in mind too when adding new features or making 
> >> other
> >> drastic changes, but the reminder should be welcome.
> > [snip]
> >> o Since we have a separate ACPI option and because ACPI now is almost a 
> >> mandatory
> >> thing (and not a significant source of boot troubles), maybe we could 
> >> remove the
> >> code that automatically disables ACPI in Safe Mode?
> >> 
> >> o hint.apic.0.disabled - APIC code doesn't seem to be a significant source 
> >> of boot
> >> troubles, like ACPI it has become almost a mandatory thing.  So maybe we 
> >> should
> >> remove this setting?
> 
> Turning off the APIC turns off SMP in a very efficient, clean manner.  I 
> added this not to isolate the APIC code, but to turn off SMP.  That's why 
it's there, and I'd like the ability to turn off SMP to stay there in some 
form.  If there's a better way to disable SMP that doesn't get into 
problems with interrupt delivery, then please propose it.  As for it being 
mandatory, it's really only mandatory for MSI these days, though it used 
to be required for more complex PCIX topologies.

You want APIC for other things as well (hwpmc(4) requires it, as do CMCI
interrupts, and we really do like to make use of the local APIC timer).

> > [dropped proposals snipped]
> >> o hw.eisa_slot - Looks like something from ancient times.  Probably just
> >> irrelevant for most systems.
> >> 
> 
> This turns off probes in the ISA ioport space that used to cause problems.  
> Why get rid of it?  Is its presence causing you problems?

I agree this should probably stay.

-- 
John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to