On May 24, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:16:42 +0200 > Damjan Marion <dmar...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> >>> On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>> >>>> I think the PandaBoard ES is fully supported by U-Boot, >>>> so it should be possible to use ubldr as part of the boot >>>> chain for that just like I've been doing with BeagleBone. >>> >>> What are the benefits of using ubldr compared to what we are doing >>> today(load; go)? > > Preload modules for example. (if it accessible of course)
I was looking into this few months ago but I didn't found a value in doing this in embedded world where we already have custom kernel for each SoC/board. Maybe we will have GENERIC arm kernel one day, but there is long road.... Damjan_______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
